Thiemo de Bakker vs Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. de Bakker vs C. Stebe

Thiemo de Bakker
NED
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
37
Age
35
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
846
C. Rank
438
40
Best Rank
71
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$785.9K
Career Money
$561.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
GER
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
37
Age
35
6'4" (193 cm)
Height
5'11" (180 cm)
846
C. Rank
438
40
Best Rank
71
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$785.9K
Career Money
$561.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-to-head: Bakker 1 - 0 Stebe
They have played 3 sets in total, with Thiemo de Bakker winning 2 and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe winning 1. The last match between Thiemo de Bakker and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was at the Alphen Challenger, 09-09-2016, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Bakker | 1 |
Stebe | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Alphen Challenger(09-09-16)
Thiemo de Bakker
7
3
6
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
6
6
4
T. d. Bakker vs C. Stebe H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$785,940 | Career Prize Money | $561,390 |
60.48% (453-296) | Career Total W/L | 59.66% (355-240) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
25 | Titles | 14 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. d. Bakker vs C. Stebe Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thiemo de Bakker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has won 42.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thiemo de Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has won 47.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thiemo de Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has saved 52.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thiemo de Bakker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cedrik-Marcel Stebe winning 65.63% (W/L 21/11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thiemo de Bakker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 295/157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 24/41). Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 64/39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 10/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Thiemo de Bakker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.00% of matches (W/L 11/9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thiemo de Bakker winning 1 times and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Thiemo de Bakker winning 2 and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe winning 1.
- The last match between Thiemo de Bakker and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe was at the Alphen Challenger, 09-09-2016, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:20.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thiemo de Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has played against players with an average rank of 367.59.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thiemo de Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thiemo de Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has converted 30.77% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Thiemo de Bakker vs Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. d. Bakker vs C. Stebe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
16 | Games Won | 16 |
10 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
2:4:20 | Average Match Time | 2:4:20 |
67% (62/93) | 1st Serve % | 56% (61/108) |
73% (45/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (39/61) |
61% (19/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (29/47) |
22% (2/9) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
37% (40/108) | Return Points Win % | 31% (29/93) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Bakker 0%, Stebe 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bakker 0%, Stebe 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Bakker 0%, Stebe 59%.
T. d. Bakker Recent Matches Played
C. Stebe Recent Matches Played

T. d. Bakker vs C. Stebe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.48% (453/296) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.66% (355/240) |
58.09% (1045/754) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.67% (786/601) |
53.02% (9158/8115) | Games Win/Loss | 52.67% (6896/6196) |
60.61% (120/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.31% (86/59) |
65.27% (295/157) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.52% (187/122) |
38.36% (28/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.50% (72/47) |
38.46% (10/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.45% (10/12) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
3677 | Aces Total | 1344 |
0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
841 | Total Double Faults | 1271 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:27 |
597.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 558.22 |
60% (22846/38127) | 1st Serve % | 61% (19785/32212) |
73% (16758/22846) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (13193/19785) |
51% (7774/15280) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6199/12427) |
41% (1410/3428) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1512/3501) |
37% (14457/38621) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13623/32634) |
36.96% (17/29) | Slam W/L | 41.18% (21/30) |
53.33% (24/21) | Masters W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
53.33% (16/14) | Cups W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
52.14% (73/67) | Main Tour W/L | 51.72% (60/56) |
61.81% (178/110) | Challenger W/L | 62.87% (193/114) |
72.50% (145/55) | Futures W/L | 68.75% (77/35) |
63% (429/685) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (341/560) |
38% (20/52) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (8/24) |
52% (139/268) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (91/168) |
55% (131/239) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (105/171) |
84% (446/373) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (325/292) |
16% (446/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (325/32) |
26% (301/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (270/62) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 12/10/25
PredictionW1
1.74
W2
2.01
09:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
2.2
W2
1.67
09:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.43
W2
2.81
09:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
1.9
W2
1.9
11:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
3.65
W2
1.28
11:00 AM 13/10/25
PredictionW1
2.23
W2
1.65
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
13:30
H2H 4-2
11:30
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 2-1
09:00
H2H 2-0
11:00
H2H 1-1
Tennis Events This Week
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
China
Almaty Open - Almaty
Kazakhstan
BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm
Sweden
European Open - Brussels
Belgium
Curitiba Challenger
Brazil
Fairfield Challenger
United States
Hersonissos 5 Challenger
Greece
Hersonissos 6 Challenger
Greece
Jinan Challenger
China
Lincoln Challenger
United States
Olbia Challenger
Italy
Roanne Challenger
France
Shenzhen Challenger
China
Valencia Challenger
Spain
M15 Castellon
Spain
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Offenbach
Germany
M15 Pontevedra
Spain
M15 Rodez
France
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Villers-les-Nancy
France
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Perth
Australia
M25 Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula
Italy